DygiScape

Choosing a candidate is every bit as much as declaring your personal ability to be capable of your own governance. Therefore, information is everything…the kind of information that we can’t afford to be played with by the agenda driven mainstream media;

Barack Hussein Obama
http://bhobama.blogspot.com/

John “Juan” McCain
http://juanmccain.blogspot.com/

Hillary Can’t Wait: Screw’emGate
http://conservativesuperiority.com/?p=205

Hildabeast
http://hilldabeast.com/index.php?m=s

Downside Legacy at Two Degrees of Bill Clinton
http://alamo-girl.com/index.htm

The Clinton Legacy
http://clinton-legacy.org/

( And just in case McCain is about to pick the Huckster for Veep )

Mike “The Huckster” Huckabee
http://mikeyhuckabee.blogspot.com/

Mike Huckabee’s Skeleton Closet
http://www.realchange.org/huckabee.htm

You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.

You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.

You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.

You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.

You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.

You cannot build character and courage by taking away men’s initiative
and independence.

You cannot help men permanently by doing for them, what they could and
should do for themselves.

Abraham Lincoln

Oh HO! You may delete the post without an ounce of my care in the slightest.

An American citizen listens to the candidates, checks their backgrounds thoroughly for a number of reasons, learns the issues to truly competent levels and looks at all available information to make their informed choice in the responsibility as we’ve been specifically instructed to do from our founding fathers who designed our government and its safeguards through situational genius.

However, to offer the vast amount of information in the above links as being my personal “radical view” is quite insane and to further suggest voters are not capable of discerning truth from fiction on their own when presented ALL the material required is a statement of denial…nothing more.

FURTHER, to suggest we should never mention a middle name of a candidate because it also happens to be a “dead war criminal” and disregarding the fact that this candidate also did not observe the simplest of American customs in adopting an American first name is another statement of sheer denial.

After reviewing your ludicrous positions I would actually prefer to see reasonable and rational information not listed on a personal blog whose host is far too busy in denial to be capable of their own governance. However, you may keep the following quote to commit to your memory;

“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child - miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill disciplined, despotic, and useless. Liberalism is the philosophy of sniveling brats.” - P.J. O’Rourke

For what it’s worth, Obama is one of very few Congressmen to have a worse record on gun rights than Rodham-Clinton; and that’s saying something. On the plus side he’s more legitimately anti-war than Hillary, although his health care plan makes less sense. The only other thing positive I can say about Rodham-Clinton is that she’s so divisive that members of Congress won’t have any political fallout from opposing her ideas; where on the other hand they might catch flak for opposing the ideas of Mr. Audacious Hope for Change (not to mention additional flak for opposing the First Black President®). I’m actually a supporter of legislative gridlock- don’t forget, “bipartisanship” is what got you the border fence, the Iraq war, No Child Left Behind, drug war escalation, and the PATRIOT Act.

This election year is pretty apathy-inducing when you think about it. Hillary will be more like Bush than any other candidate (McCain included), Obama looks good on paper but so did Bill Clinton; and Juan McCain is totally unacceptable. McCain will stay in Iraq and so will Hillary, make no mistake- and it wouldn’t surprise me if Obama found a reason to stay as well. The Iraq war is good political hay for a re-election campaign on the part of either Democrat- each dead soldier is a talking point about “Bush’s War” or “The Republicans’ War” and the sooner it’s over the sooner they lose the anti-war vote. Hillary herself said that she’d be out by 2013, she’s hedging her bets on her re-election already.

Obama is currently the darling of the Internet and I understand your endorsement of him, but there are several problems with him: He openly admits that he would repeal the Tiahrt Amendment, support a reintroduction of the 1994 “Assault Weapon” ban, and other anti-gun-rights positions even more ridiculous than those, such as “gun show loophole” nonsense and others. He talks about energy but refuses to endorse (or even talk about) nuclear- this is unforgivable in today’s energy debate. He supports expanding hate-crime laws and enforcement… and nothing has changed in 20 years, hate-crime laws are still an answer in search of a question. On immigration he promises to crack down on employers but anyone with a brain knows that’s not going to happen with any candidate. Plus he talks about “creating secure borders” and “increasing personnel/infrastructure/etc” (which is what they all say), and that means billions more wasted and increased militarization of police- this is also unacceptable. On Iraq he pledges to continue humanitiarian efforts in that country- that means more combat soldiers repurposed as police and social workers; and billions more dollars to companies to go and fix power lines at an 800% markup… with more soldiers getting killed in convoys in support of these contractors, more lives wasted for nothing. He supports increased surveillance and regulation of Internet traffic.

One good thing I will say about him is that he calls for increased care for veterans, although that’s the same thing Bush said and look at the abysmal state of veterans’ care these days.

Again, on paper Obama seems the lesser of the three evils; and as much as I absolutely detest Rodham-Clinton, from a pragmatic perspective she may be a wiser choice due to solely to the fact that many of her proposals would be gridlocked. McCain is so unappealing to me that I’ll not mention him again.

I could get behind Obama if he would amend his platform to:
Expedite construction of nuclear power plants- 40% of nation’s electricity generated via nuclear by end of first term or begin construction of at least 50 plants by that time. Double funding for research and construction of pebble-bed reactors.
Roll back militarization of police forces- end federal equipment purchase programs and crosstraining with military forces.
Effective legislation (up to and including Constitutional Ammendments) regulating procedures for no-knock warrant service and dynamic entries.
Immediate withdrawal from Iraq, enforcement of no-fly zones and punitive airstrikes only.*
Phased withdrawal from Afghanistan, to begin immediately.
Comprehensive review of all Iraq contracts.
Total and unconditional repeal of USA PATRIOT.
Reduce size and budget of DHS by at least 50%
Remeber the lessons of 1994 and stop beating the gun control drum.
Mandatory criminal prosecution for Congressmen who commit financial misconduct.
Federal oversight of state prison systems; nationwide initiative to eliminate prison rape and violence against staff and/or inmates. Eliminate private prisons, alternatively hold contractors criminally liable for abuse/neglect or violence.
End No Child Left Behind.

*Alternatively, suspend all non-Iraq spending and properly arm and armor forces stationed in Iraq; bolster troop numbers by 25-40% (via draft if necessary)… basically, get it done or get out. Also, define what “getting it done” means; lay out what the conditions of “victory” are. /sarcasm

Eh, if I had noticed that the guy above me who copied & pasted all the Michael Savage nicknames/talking points had used “Juan McCain,” I wouldn’t have. Oh well.