<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microhoo: Microsoft to Acquire Yahoo for $44.6 Billion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joemanna.com/blog/microhoo-microsoft-to-acquire-yahoo-for-446-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/microhoo-microsoft-to-acquire-yahoo-for-446-billion/</link>
	<description>Joe Manna&#039;s Personal Blog. Community manager, social media strategist and very opinionated.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 05:50:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: s2art</title>
		<link>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/microhoo-microsoft-to-acquire-yahoo-for-446-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-48675</link>
		<dc:creator>s2art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 08:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joemanna.com/blog/microhoo-microsoft-to-acquire-yahoo-for-446-billion/#comment-48675</guid>
		<description>Reading between the lines, Micro$oft is running scared of google. Guess it&#039;s time I paid more attention to what they have to offer, and considered a move across.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading between the lines, Micro$oft is running scared of google. Guess it&#8217;s time I paid more attention to what they have to offer, and considered a move across.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microhoo: No Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/microhoo-microsoft-to-acquire-yahoo-for-446-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-43730</link>
		<dc:creator>Microhoo: No Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joemanna.com/blog/microhoo-microsoft-to-acquire-yahoo-for-446-billion/#comment-43730</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft proposed to acquire Yahoo for $31 per share. Proposition made official on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft proposed to acquire Yahoo for $31 per share. Proposition made official on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oxm</title>
		<link>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/microhoo-microsoft-to-acquire-yahoo-for-446-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-42285</link>
		<dc:creator>oxm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joemanna.com/blog/microhoo-microsoft-to-acquire-yahoo-for-446-billion/#comment-42285</guid>
		<description>YahMic!   That will be the name.  $60 billion will do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YahMic!   That will be the name.  $60 billion will do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo Raises the Stakes with Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/microhoo-microsoft-to-acquire-yahoo-for-446-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-41542</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo Raises the Stakes with Microsoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joemanna.com/blog/microhoo-microsoft-to-acquire-yahoo-for-446-billion/#comment-41542</guid>
		<description>[...] shots in this deal, rumors speculate Yahoo may merge with AOL. As crazy as it sounds, it will help MicroHoo-OL compete against the likes of Google. I imagine this will be a tough one to sell to the shareholders [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shots in this deal, rumors speculate Yahoo may merge with AOL. As crazy as it sounds, it will help MicroHoo-OL compete against the likes of Google. I imagine this will be a tough one to sell to the shareholders [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Junkyard Willie</title>
		<link>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/microhoo-microsoft-to-acquire-yahoo-for-446-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-40035</link>
		<dc:creator>Junkyard Willie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 07:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joemanna.com/blog/microhoo-microsoft-to-acquire-yahoo-for-446-billion/#comment-40035</guid>
		<description>&quot;Who has the upper hand?&quot;

Stopped reading there.  Nothing can stop the Microsoft juggernaut (except perhaps enforcement of antitrust laws).  Yahoo wouldn&#039;t be cashing out if they thought they were in a position to make a power play. Blogging, &#039;social networking,&#039; web 2.0... these things don&#039;t matter, what matters is getting ad clicks from casual users (i.e. grandma as she&#039;s going to play some poker or mah jong and maybe check out the pictures from the grandkids birthday on a horrible flickr page).  MS wins here because some grandmas know and love their MSN mah jong, and some of them know and love their Yahoo mah jong... now MS has the revenue stream from both and the users aren&#039;t even going to realize the difference.  

Making money from the internet isn&#039;t like the old days where savvy users take advantage of great things and pay top dollar for them.  This isn&#039;t 1999.  Well, some of that happens, but the main scheme is to oversell and take advantage of casual, unsophisticated users.  Look at the ISP&#039;s- they oversell their bandwidth, you&#039;ve got millions of grandmas paying for a 3mbps pipe and playing mah jong a couple times a week, maybe checking their email on the holidays.  They&#039;re so used to this model that you&#039;ve AT&amp;T pricing out usage caps on unlimited service- you&#039;ve Comcast shutting down those users who use too much bandwidth (even on &#039;unlimited&#039; plans); they do this because they know that the users who take full advantage of the service they pay for is only a small amount, maybe 5%.  They&#039;re concerned with the 95% who don&#039;t know any better- those are the people that click here for a free ipod, you know.  This Yahoo deal is the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Who has the upper hand?&#8221;</p>
<p>Stopped reading there.  Nothing can stop the Microsoft juggernaut (except perhaps enforcement of antitrust laws).  Yahoo wouldn&#8217;t be cashing out if they thought they were in a position to make a power play. Blogging, &#8217;social networking,&#8217; web 2.0&#8230; these things don&#8217;t matter, what matters is getting ad clicks from casual users (i.e. grandma as she&#8217;s going to play some poker or mah jong and maybe check out the pictures from the grandkids birthday on a horrible flickr page).  MS wins here because some grandmas know and love their MSN mah jong, and some of them know and love their Yahoo mah jong&#8230; now MS has the revenue stream from both and the users aren&#8217;t even going to realize the difference.  </p>
<p>Making money from the internet isn&#8217;t like the old days where savvy users take advantage of great things and pay top dollar for them.  This isn&#8217;t 1999.  Well, some of that happens, but the main scheme is to oversell and take advantage of casual, unsophisticated users.  Look at the ISP&#8217;s- they oversell their bandwidth, you&#8217;ve got millions of grandmas paying for a 3mbps pipe and playing mah jong a couple times a week, maybe checking their email on the holidays.  They&#8217;re so used to this model that you&#8217;ve AT&amp;T pricing out usage caps on unlimited service- you&#8217;ve Comcast shutting down those users who use too much bandwidth (even on &#8216;unlimited&#8217; plans); they do this because they know that the users who take full advantage of the service they pay for is only a small amount, maybe 5%.  They&#8217;re concerned with the 95% who don&#8217;t know any better- those are the people that click here for a free ipod, you know.  This Yahoo deal is the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
