<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kevin Conroy Speaks Spanish? (Leaves AOL for Univision)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joemanna.com/blog/kevin-conroy-speaks-spanish-leaves-aol-for-univision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/kevin-conroy-speaks-spanish-leaves-aol-for-univision/</link>
	<description>Joe Manna&#039;s Personal Blog. Community manager, social media strategist and very opinionated.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:42:27 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marah Marie</title>
		<link>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/kevin-conroy-speaks-spanish-leaves-aol-for-univision/comment-page-1/#comment-48704</link>
		<dc:creator>Marah Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joemanna.com/blog/?p=1033#comment-48704</guid>
		<description>Good post, Joe. Sorry I&#039;m late to it but I&#039;ve been crazy busy...you explained the hardship the closing down of those products created for AOL users, and the loyalty that was lost as a result of those closings, better than I could. I tend to stay away from the emotional fallout of things unless I&#039;m really ranting, which is exactly where you went with this. Conroy&#039;s destructive path was so wide that even here where you wrote:

&quot;Thank you for destroying the user experience the best you could. The only products that remained after your tenure are AOL Mail, AIM, AOL Message Boards and Chat Rooms...&quot; 

I paused because I couldn&#039;t help but think to myself that &lt;a href=&quot;http://anti-aol.livejournal.com/102267.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the message boards got partially destroyed&lt;/a&gt; too, along with &lt;a href=&quot;http://anti-aol.livejournal.com/104952.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;email&lt;/a&gt; - at least overseas, for the free users. And AOL wouldn&#039;t so much as do a press release to discuss either one of those decisions - a very deliberate &quot;oversight&quot; on their part because they don&#039;t want the negative backlash from the media and blogs over it -  which still ticks me off to this day. 

What I have the hardest hard time letting go of is not that someone - anyone - makes a mistake or fails to tell the truth, because we all do that from time to time - but that the person or people responsible for it won&#039;t admit it and make appropriate statements and apologies as needed, even once they&#039;re called on what they did by many people. That sort of behavior is heinous, and that is exactly the sort of behavior many of the people at AOL consistently display.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, Joe. Sorry I&#8217;m late to it but I&#8217;ve been crazy busy&#8230;you explained the hardship the closing down of those products created for AOL users, and the loyalty that was lost as a result of those closings, better than I could. I tend to stay away from the emotional fallout of things unless I&#8217;m really ranting, which is exactly where you went with this. Conroy&#8217;s destructive path was so wide that even here where you wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;Thank you for destroying the user experience the best you could. The only products that remained after your tenure are AOL Mail, AIM, AOL Message Boards and Chat Rooms&#8230;&#8221; </p>
<p>I paused because I couldn&#8217;t help but think to myself that <a href="http://anti-aol.livejournal.com/102267.html" rel="nofollow">the message boards got partially destroyed</a> too, along with <a href="http://anti-aol.livejournal.com/104952.html" rel="nofollow">email</a> &#8211; at least overseas, for the free users. And AOL wouldn&#8217;t so much as do a press release to discuss either one of those decisions &#8211; a very deliberate &#8220;oversight&#8221; on their part because they don&#8217;t want the negative backlash from the media and blogs over it &#8211;  which still ticks me off to this day. </p>
<p>What I have the hardest hard time letting go of is not that someone &#8211; anyone &#8211; makes a mistake or fails to tell the truth, because we all do that from time to time &#8211; but that the person or people responsible for it won&#8217;t admit it and make appropriate statements and apologies as needed, even once they&#8217;re called on what they did by many people. That sort of behavior is heinous, and that is exactly the sort of behavior many of the people at AOL consistently display.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda</title>
		<link>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/kevin-conroy-speaks-spanish-leaves-aol-for-univision/comment-page-1/#comment-48700</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joemanna.com/blog/?p=1033#comment-48700</guid>
		<description>Regarding message boards, do you still have any ins with the message board &quot;whiz kids&quot; (ha!) at AOL?  If you do, could you please let them know that the message board search hasn&#039;t been working correctly for TWO MONTHS now. Don&#039;t they ever test their product?  I know that in the past they never fixed the search feature until notified by someone else within AOL. Now there is no one that is responsive to users&#039; e-mails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding message boards, do you still have any ins with the message board &#8220;whiz kids&#8221; (ha!) at AOL?  If you do, could you please let them know that the message board search hasn&#8217;t been working correctly for TWO MONTHS now. Don&#8217;t they ever test their product?  I know that in the past they never fixed the search feature until notified by someone else within AOL. Now there is no one that is responsive to users&#8217; e-mails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
